Skip to content

13





文本

████    重点词汇
████    难点词汇
████    生僻词
████    词组 & 惯用语

[学习本文需要基础词汇量:7,000 ]
[本次分析采用基础词汇量:8,000 ]

Chapter 13: The family ↵ Of all the institutions

that have come down to us from the past none is

in the present day so disorganised and derailed

as the family. Affection of parents for children

and of children for parents is capable of being

one of the greatest sources of happiness, but in

fact at the present day the relations of parents

and children are, in nine cases out of ten, a

source of unhappiness to both parties, and in

ninety-nine cases out of a hundred a source of

unhappiness to at least one of the two parties.

This failure of the family to provide the

fundamental satisfaction which in principle it is

capable of yielding is one of the most

deep-seated causes of the discontent which is

prevalent in our age. The adult who wishes to

have a happy relation with his own children or to

provide a happy life for them must reflect deeply

upon parenthood, and, having reflected, must act

wisely. The subject of the family is far too vast

to be dealt with in this volume except in

relation to our own special problem, namely the

conquest of happiness. And even in relation to

that problem we can deal with it only in so far

as amelioration lies within the power of each

individual without alterations in the social

structure. ↵ This is, of course, a very grave

limitation, for the causes of family unhappiness

in our day are of the most diverse sorts,

psychological, economic, social, educational, and

political. Where the well-to-do sections of the

community are concerned, two causes have combined

to make women feel parenthood a burden far

heavier than it was ever felt to be in former

times. These two causes are, on the one hand, the

opening of careers to single women; on the other

hand, the decay of domestic service. In old days

women were driven into marriage by the

intolerable conditions of life for the spinster.

The spinster had to live at home in economic

dependence, first upon her father, and then upon

some reluctant brother. She had no occupations to

fill her days and no liberty to enjoy herself

outside the sheltered walls of the family

mansion. She had neither the opportunity nor the

inclination for sexual adventure, which she

herself profoundly believed to be an abomination

except within marriage. If, in spite of all

safeguards, she lost her virtue through the wiles

of some designing fascinator, her situation was

pitiable in the extreme. It is delineated quite

accurately in The Vicar of Wakefield: ↵ The only

art her guilt to cover, ↵ To hide her shame from

ev'ry eye, ↵ To give repentance to her lover ↵

And wring his bosom is - to die. ↵ The modern

spinster does not consider death necessary in

these circumstances. If she has had a good

education, she has no difficulty in making a

comfortable living, and is therefore independent

of parental approval. Since parents have lost

their economic power over their daughters, they

have become much more chary of expressing moral

disapproval of them; there is not much use in

scolding a person who won't stay to be scolded.

The unmarried young woman of the professional

classes is therefore able nowadays, provided she

is not below the average in intelligence and

attractiveness, to enjoy a thoroughly agreeable

life so long as she can keep free from the desire

for children. But if this desire overwhelms her,

she is compelled to marry, and almost certainly

to lose her job. She sinks to a much lower level

of comfort than that to which she has been

accustomed, since her husband's income is very

likely no larger than that which she was

previously earning, and has to provide for a

family instead of only a single woman. After

having enjoyed independence, she finds it galling

to have to look to another for every penny of

necessary expenditure. For all these reasons such

women hesitate to embark upon maternity. ↵ A

woman who nevertheless does take the plunge finds

herself, as compared with the women of former

generations, confronted with a new and appalling

problem, namely the paucity and bad quality of

domestic service. In consequence of this, she

becomes tied to her house, compelled to perform

herself a thousand trivial tasks quite unworthy

of her ability and training or, if she does not

perform them herself, to ruin her temper by

scolding the maids who neglect them. In regard to

the physical care of her children, if she has

taken pains to become well-informed in this

matter, she finds that it is impossible, without

grave risk of disaster, to entrust the children

to nurses, or even to leave to others the most

elementary precautions in regard to cleanliness

and hygiene, unless she can afford a nurse who

has had an expensive training at some institute.

Weighed down by a mass of trivial detail, she is

fortunate indeed if she does not soon lose all

her charm and three-quarters of her intelligence.

Too often through the mere performance of

necessary duties such women become wearisome to

their husbands and a nuisance to their children.

When the evening comes and her husband returns

from his work, the woman who talks about her

day-time troubles is a bore, and the woman who

does not is absent-minded. In relation to her

children, the sacrifices that she had made in

order to have them are so present to her mind

that she is almost sure to demand more reward

than it is desirable to expect, while the

constant habit of attending to trivial details

will have made her fussy and small-minded. This

is the most pernicious of all the injustices that

she has to suffer: that in consequence of doing

her duty by her family she has lost their

affection, whereas if she had neglected them and

remained gay and charming they would probably

have loved her. This whole problem as it affects

the professional classes is treated with

remarkable insight and constructive ability in

The Retreat from Parenthood, by Jean Aylin. ↵

These troubles are essentially economic, and so

is another which is almost equally grave. I mean

the difficulties in regard to housing which

result from the concentration of populations in

large cities. In the Middle Ages cities were as

rural as the country is now. Children still sing

the nursery rhyme: ↵ Upon Paul's steeple stands

a tree ↵ As full of apples as may be, ↵ The

little boys of London town ↵ They run with sticks

to knock them down. ↵ And then they run from

hedge to hedge ↵ Until they come to London

Bridge. ↵ Paul's steeple is gone, and I do not

know at what date the hedges disappeared between

St Paul's and London Bridge. It is many centuries

since the little boys of London town could enjoy

such pleasures as this rhyme suggests, but until

not so very long ago the bulk of the population

lived in the country. The towns were not very

vast; it was easy to get out of them, and by no

means uncommon to find gardens attached to many

houses in them. Nowadays there is in England an

immense preponderance of the urban over the rural

population. In America this preponderance is as

yet slight, but it is very rapidly increasing.

Cities like London and New York are so large that

it takes a very long time to get out of them.

Those who live in the city usually have to be

content with a flat, to which, of course, not a

square inch of soil is attached, and in which

people of moderate means have to be content with

the absolute minimum of space. If there are young

children, life in a flat is difficult. There is

no room for them to play, and there is no room

for their parents to get away from their noise.

Consequently professional men tend more and more

to live in the suburbs. This is undoubtedly

desirable from the point of view of the children,

but it adds considerably to the fatigue of the

man's life, and greatly diminishes the part which

he can play in the family. ↵ Such large economic

problems, however, it is not my intention to

discuss, since they lie outside the problem with

which we are concerned, namely what the

individual can here and now do to find happiness.

We come nearer to this problem when we pass to

the psychological difficulties which exist in the

present age in the relations of parents and

children. These are really part of the problems

raised by democracy. In old days there were

masters and slaves: the masters decided what was

to be done, and on the whole liked their slaves,

since their slaves ministered to their happiness.

The slaves may possibly have hated their masters,

though this did not happen nearly so universally

as democratic theory would have us suppose. But

even if they did hate their masters, their

masters remained unaware of this fact, and the

masters at any rate were happy. With the general

acceptance of democratic theory all this was

changed: slaves who had acquiesced before ceased

to acquiesce; masters who had formerly had no

doubts as to their rights became hesitant and

uncertain. Friction arose and caused unhappiness

on both sides. I am not saying all this as an

argument against democracy, for the troubles in

question are only such as are inevitable in any

important transition. But it is no use to blink

the fact that, while this transition is in

progress it makes the world uncomfortable. ↵ The

change in the relation between parents and

children is a particular example of the general

spread of democracy. Parents are no longer sure

of their rights as against their children;

children no longer feel that they owe respect to

their parents. The virtue of obedience, which was

formerly exacted without question, has become

unfashionable, and rightly so. Psycho-analysis

has terrified educated parents with the fear of

the harm they may unwittingly do their children.

If they kiss them, they may produce an Oedipus

complex; if they do not they may produce a fury

of jealousy. If they order the children to do

things they may be producing a sense of sin; if

they do not, the children acquire habits which

the parents think undesirable. When they see

their baby sucking his thumb, they draw all kinds

of terrifying inferences, but they are quite at a

loss as to what to do to stop him. Parenthood,

which used to be a triumphant exercise of power,

has become timid, anxious, and filled with

conscientious doubts. The old simple joys are

lost, and that at the very moment when, owing to

the new freedom of single women, the mother has

had to sacrifice much more than formerly in

deciding upon maternity. In these circumstances

conscientious mothers ask too little of their

children, and unconscientious mothers ask too

much. Conscientious mothers restrain their

natural affection and become shy; unconscientious

mothers seek in their children a compensation for

the joys that they have had to forgo. In the one

case the child's affections are starved, in the

other they are over-stimulated. In neither case

is there any of that simple and natural happiness

that the family at its best can provide. ↵ In

view of all these troubles, is it any wonder that

the birth-rate declines? The decline of the

birth-rate in the population at large has reached

a point which shows that the population will soon

begin to dwindle, but among the well-to-do

classes this point has long ago been passed, not

only in one country, but in practically all the

most highly civilised countries. There are not

very many statistics available as to the

birth-rate among the well-to-do, but two facts

may be quoted from Jean Aylin's book alluded to

above. It appears that in Stockholm in the years

1919 to 1922 the fertility of professional women

was only one-third of that of the population at

large, and that among the four thousand graduates

of Wellesley College, U. S. A. , in the period

1896 to 1913 the total number of children is

about three thousand, whereas to prevent an

actual dwindling of the stock there should have

been eight thousand children none of whom had

died young. There can be no doubt the

civilisation produced by the white races has this

singular characteristic, that in proportion as

men and women absorb it, they become sterile. The

most civilised are the most sterile; the least

civlised are the most fertile; and between the

two there is a continual gradation. At present

the most intelligent sections of the Western

nations are dying out. Within a very few years

the Western nations as a whole will be

diminishing in numbers except in so far as their

stocks are replenished by immigration from less

civilised regions. And as soon as the immigrants

acquire the civilisation of the country of their

adoption they in turn will become comparatively

sterile. It is clear that a civilisation which

has this characteristic is unstable; unless it

can be induced to reproduce its numbers, it must

sooner or later die out and give place to some

other civilisation in which the urge towards

parenthood has retained enough strength to

prevent the population from declining. ↵

Official moralists in every Western country have

endeavoured to treat this problem by means of

exhortations and sentimentality. On the one hand,

they say that it is the duty of every married

couple to have as many children as God wills,

regardless of any prospect that such children may

have of health and happiness. On the Other hand,

male divines prate about the sacred joys of

motherhood and pretend that a large family of

diseased and poverty-stricken infants is a source

of happiness. The State joins in with the

argument that an adequate crop of cannon fodder

is necessary, for how can all these exquisite and

ingenious weapous of destruction function

adequately unless there are sufficient

populations left for them to destroy? Strange to

say, the individual parent, even if he accepts

these arguments as applied to others, remains

entirely deaf to them as applied to himself. The

psychology of the divines and the patriots is at

fault. The divines may succeed so long as they

can successfully threaten hell-fire, but it is

only a minority of the population that now takes

this threat seriously. And no threat short of

this is adequate to control behaviour in a matter

so essentially private. As for the State, its

argument is altogether too ferocious. People may

agree that others ought to provide cannon fodder,

but they are not attracted by the prospect of

having their own children used in this way. All

that the State can do, therefore, is to endeavour

to keep the poor in ignorance, an effort which,

as the statistics show, is singularly

unssuccessful except in the most backward of

Western countries. Very few men or women will

have children from a sense of public duty, even

if it were far clearer than it is that any such

public duty exists. When men and women have

children, they do so either because they believe

that children will add to their happiness, or

because they do not know how to prevent them. The

latter reason still operates very powerfully, but

it is steadily diminishing in potency. And

nothing that either the State or the Churches can

do will prevent this diminution from continuing.

It is necessary, therefore, if the white races

are to survive, that parenthood should again

become capable of yielding happiness to parents.

↵ When one considers human nature apart from the

circumstances of the present day, it is clear, I

think, that parenthood is psychologically capable

of providing the greatest and most enduring

happiness that life has to offer. This, no doubt,

is more true of women than of men, but is more

true of men than most moderns are inclined to

suppose. It is taken for granted in almost all

literature before the present age. Hecuba cares

more for her children than for Priam; MacDuff

cares more for his children than for his wife. In

the Old Testament both men and women are

passionately concerned to leave descendants; in

China and Japan this attitude has persisted down

to our own day. It will be said that this desire

is due to ancestor worship. I think, however,

that the contrary is the truth, namely that

ancestor worship is a reflection of the interest

people take in the persistence of their family.

Reverting to the professional women whom we were

considering a moment ago, it is clear that the

urge to have children must be very powerful, for

otherwise none of them would make the sacrifices

required in order to satisfy it. For my own part,

speaking personally, I have found the happiness

of parenthood greater than any other that I have

experienced. I believe that when circumstances

lead men or women to forgo this happiness, a very

deep need remains ungratified, and that this

produces a dissatisfaction and listlessness of

which the cause may remain quite unknown. To be

happy in this world, especially when youth is

past, it is necessary to feel oneself not merely

an isolated individual whose day will soon be

over, but part of the stream of life flowing on

from the first germ to the remote and unknown

future. As a conscious sentiment, expressed in

set terms, this involves no doubt a

hyper-civilised and intellectual outlook upon the

world, but as a vague instinctive emotion it is

primitive and natural, and it is its absence that

is hyper-civilised. A man who is capable of some

great and remarkable achievement which sets its

stamp upon future ages may gratify this feeling

through his work, but for men and women who have

no exceptional gifts, the only way to do so is

through children. Those who have allowed their

procreative impulses to become atrophied have

separated themselves from the stream of life, and

in so doing have run a grave risk of becoming

desiccated. For them, unless they are

exceptionally impersonal, death ends all. The

world that shall come after them does not concern

them, and because of this their doings appear to

themselves trivial and unimportant. To the man or

woman who has children and grandchildren and

loves them with a natural affection, the future

is important, at any rate to the limit of their

lives, not only through morality or through an

effort of imagination, but naturally and

instinctively. And the man whose interests have

been stretched to this extent beyond his personal

life is likely to be able to stretch then still

further. Like Abraham, he will derive

satisfaction from the thought that his seed are

to inherit the promised land even if this is not

to happen for many generations. And through such

feelings he is saved from the sense of futility

which otherwise deadens all his emotions. ↵ The

basis of the family is, of course, the fact that

parents feel a special kind of affection towards

their own children, different from that which

they feel towards each other or towards other

children. It is true that some parents feel

little or no parental affection, and it is also

true that some women are capable of feeling an

affection for children not their own almost as

strong as that which they could feel for their

own. Nevertheless, the broad fact remains that

parental affection is a special kind of feeling

which the normal human being experiences towards

his or her own children, but not towards any

other human being. This emotion is one which we

inherit from our animal ancestors. In this

respect Freud seems to me not sufficiently

biological in his outlook, for anyone who will

observe an animal mother with her young can see

that her behaviour towards them follows an

entirely different pattern from her behaviour

towards the male with whom she has sex relations.

And this same different and instinctive pattern,

though in a modified and less definite form,

exists among human beings. If it were not for

this special emotion there would be almost

nothing to be said for the family as an

institution, since children might equally well be

left to the care of professionals. As things are,

however, the special affection which parents have

for children, provided their instincts are not

atrophied, is of value both to the parents

themselves and to the children. The value of

parental affection to children lies largely in

the fact that it is more reliable than any other

affection. One's friends like one for one's

merits, one's lovers for one's charms; if the

merits or the charms diminish, friends and lovers

may vanish. But it is in times of misfortune that

parents are most to be relied upon, in illness,

and even in disgrace if the parents are of the

right sort. We all feel pleasure when we are

admired for our merits, but most of us are

sufficiently modest at heart to feel that such

admiration is precarious. Our parents love us

because we are their children, and this is an

unalterable fact, so that we feel more safe with

them than with anyone else. In times of success

this may seem unimportant, but in times of

failure it affords a consolation and a security

not to be found elsewhere. ↵ In all human

relations it is fairly easy to secure happiness

for one party, but much more difficult to secure

it for both. The gaoler * may enjoy guarding the

prisoner; the employer may enjoy brow-beating the

employee; the ruler may enjoy governing his

subjects with a firm hand; and the old-fashioned

father no doubt enjoyed instilling virtue into

his son by means of the rod. These, however, are

one-sided pleasures; to the other party in the

transaction the situation is less agreeable. We

have come to feel, that there is something

unsatisfactory about these one-sided delights: we

believe that a good human relation should be

satisfying to both parties. This applies more

particularly to the relations of parents and

children, with the result that parents obtain far

less pleasure from children than they did

formerly, while children reciprocally suffer less

at the hands of their parents than they did in

bygone generations. I do not think there is any

real reason why parents should derive less

happiness from their children than they did in

former times, although undoubtedly this is the

case at present. Nor do I think that there is any

reason why parents should fail to increase the

happiness of their children. But this requires,

as do all those equal relationships at which the

modern world aims, a certain delicacy and

tenderness, a certain reverence for another

personality, which are by no means encouraged by

the pugnacity of ordinary life. Let us consider

the happiness of parenthood, first in its

biological essence, and then as it may become in

a parent inspired by that kind of attitude

towards other personalities which we have been

suggesting as essential to a world that believes

in equality. ↵ gaoler = jailer / ↵ The primitive

root of the pleasure of parenthood is twofold. On

the one hand there is the feeling of part of

one's own body externalised, prolonging its life

beyond the death of the rest of one's body, and

possibly in its turn externalising part of itself

in the same fashion, and so securing the

immortality of the germ-plasm. On the other hand

there is an intimate blend of power and

tenderness. The new creature is helpless, and

there is an impulse to supply its needs, an

impulse which gratifies not only the parent's

love towards the child, but also the parent's

desire for power. So long as the infant is felt

to be helpless, the affection which is bestowed

upon it does not feel unselfish, since it is in

the nature of protection to a vulnerable portion

of oneself. But from a very early age there comes

to be a conflict between love of parental power

and desire for the child's good, for, while power

over the child is to a certain extent decreed by

the nature of things, it is nevertheless

desirable that the child should as soon as

possible learn to be independent in as many ways

as possible, which is unpleasant to the power

impulse in a parent. Some parents never become

conscious of this conflict, and remain tyrants

until the children are in a position to rebel.

Others, however, become conscious of it, and thus

find themselves a prey to conflicting emotions.

In this conflict their parental happiness is

lost. After all the care that they have bestowed

on the child, they find to their mortification

that he turns out quite different from what they

had hoped. They wanted him to be a soldier, and

they find him a pacifist, or, like Tolstoy, they

wanted him to be a pacifist, and he joins the

Black Hundreds. But it is not only in these later

developments that the difficulty is felt. If you

feed an infant who is already capable of feeding

himself, you are putting love of power before the

child's welfare, although it seems to you that

you are only being kind in saving him trouble. If

you make him too vividly aware of dangers, you

are probably actuated by a desire to keep him

dependent upon you. If you give him demonstrative

affection to which you expect a response, you are

probably endeavouring to grapple him to you by

means of his emotions. In a thousand ways, great

and small, the possessive impulse of parents will

lead them astray, unless they are very watchful

or very pure in heart. Modern parents, aware of

these dangers, sometimes lose confidence in

handling their children, and become therefore

even less able to be of use to them than if they

permitted themselves spontaneous mistakes, fot

nothing causes so much worry in a child's mind as

lack of certainty and self-confidence on the part

of an adult. Better than being careful,

therefore, is to be pure in heart. The parent who

genuinely desires the child's welfare more than

his or her power over the child will not need

textbooks on psycho-analysis to say what should

and what should not be done, but will be guided

aright by impulse. And in that case the relation

of parent and child will be harmonious from first

to last, causing no rebellion in the child and no

feeling of frustration in the parent. But this

demands on the part of the parent from the first

a respect for the personality of the child - a

respect which must be not merely a matter of

principle, whether moral or intellectual, but

something deeply felt with almost mystical

conviction to such a degree that possessiveness

and oppression become utterly impossible. It is

of course not only towards children that an

attitude of this sort is desirable: it is very

necessary in marriage, and in friendship also,

though in friendship it is less difficult. In a

good world it would pervade the political

relations between groups of human beings, though

this is so distant a hope that we need not linger

over it. But universal as is the need for this

kind of gentleness, it is needed most of all

where children are concerned, because of their

helplessness, and because their small size and

feeble strength cause vulgar souls to despise

them. ↵ But to return to the problems with which

this book is concerned, the full joy of

parenthood in the modern world is only to be

obtained by those who can deeply feel this

attitude of respect towards the child of which I

have been speaking. For to them there will be no

irksome restraint upon their love of power, and

no need to dread the bitter disillusionment which

despotic parents experience when their children

acquire freedom. And to the parent who has this

attitude there is more joy in parenthood than

ever was possible to the despot in the hey-day of

parental power. For the love that has been purged

by gentleness of all tendency towards tyranny can

give a joy more exquisite, more tender, more

capable of transmuting the base metal of daily

life into the pure gold of mystic ecstasy, than

any emotion that is possible to the man still

fighting and struggling to maintain his

ascendancy in this slippery world. ↵ While I

attach a very high value to the parental emotion,

I do not draw the inference, which is too

commonly drawn, that mothers should do as much as

possible themselves for their children. There is

a convention on this subject which was all very

well in the days when nothing was known about the

care of children except the unscientific odds and

ends that old women handed on to younger ones.

Nowadays there is a great deal in the care of

children which is best done by those who have

made a special study of some department of this

subject. In relation to that part of their

education which is called'education' this is

recognised. A mother is not expected to teach her

son the calculus, however much she may love him.

So far as the acquisition of book-learning is

concerned, it is recognised that children can

acquire it better from those who have it than

from a mother who does not have it. But in regard

to many other departments in the care of children

this is not recognjsed, because the experience

required is not yet recognised. Undoubtedly

certain things are better done by the mother, but

as the child gets older, there will be an

increasing number of things better done by

someone else. If this were generally recognised,

mothers would be saved a great deal of labour

which is irksome to them, because it is not that

in which they have professional competence. A

woman who has acquired any kind of professional

skill ought, both for her own sake and for that

of the community, to be free to continue to

exercise this skill in spite of motherhood. She

may be unable to do so during the later months of

pregnancy and during lactation, but a child over

nine months old ought not to form an insuperable

barrier to its mother's professional activities.

Whenever society demands of a mother sacrifices

to her child which go beyond reason, the mother,

if she is not unusually saintly, will expect from

her child compensations exceeding those she has a

right to expect. The mother who is conventionally

called self-sacrificing is, in a great majority

of cases, exceptionally selfish towards her

children, for, important as parenthood is an

element in life, it is not satisfying if it is

treated as the whole of life, and the unsatisfied

parent is likely to be an emotionally grasping

parent. It is important, therefore, quite as much

in the interests of the children as in those of

the mother, that motherhood should not cut her

off from all other interests and pursuits. If she

has a real vocation for the care of children and

that amount of knowledge which will enable her to

care adequately for her own children, her skill

ought to be more widely used, and she ought to be

engaged professionally in the care of some group

of children which may be expected to include her

own. It is right that parents, provided they

fulfill the minimum requirements insisted upon by

the State, should have a say as to how their

children are cared for and by whom, so long as

they do not go outside the ranks of qualified

persons. But there should be no convention

demanding that every mother should do herself

what some other woman can do better. Mothers who

feel baffled and incompetent when faced with

their children as many mothers do, should have no

hesitation in having their children cared for by

women who have an aptitude for this work and have

undergone the necessary training. There is no

heaven-sent instinct which teaches women the

right thing to do by their children, and

solicitude when it goes beyond a point is a

camouflage for possessiveness. Many a child is

psychologically ruined by ignorant and

sentimental handling on the part of its mother.

It has always been recognised that fathers cannot

be expected to do very much for their children,

and yet children are quite as apt to love their

fathers as to love their mothers. The relation of

the mother to the child will have in future to

resemble more and more that which at present the

father has, if women' s lives are to be freed

from unnecessary slavery and children are to be

allowed to profit by the scientific knowledge

which is accumulating as to the care of their

minds and bodies in early years. ↵


知识点

重点词汇
ecstasy [ˈekstəsi] n. 狂喜;入迷;忘形 {toefl gre :8057}

exquisite [ɪkˈskwɪzɪt] n. 服饰过于讲究的男子 adj. 精致的;细腻的;优美的,高雅的;异常的;剧烈的 {cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :8096}

sentimental [ˌsentɪˈmentl] adj. 伤感的;多愁善感的;感情用事的;寓有情感的 {ky toefl :8266}

grapple [ˈgræpl] n. 抓住;格斗 vi. 抓住;格斗;抓斗机 vt. 抓住;与…格斗 { :8354}

prolonging [prəˈlɔŋɪŋ] vt. 延长;拖延 { :8448}

misfortune [ˌmɪsˈfɔ:tʃu:n] n. 不幸;灾祸,灾难 {cet6 ky toefl ielts :8481}

entrust [ɪnˈtrʌst] vt. 委托,信托 {gre :8484}

intolerable [ɪnˈtɒlərəbl] adj. 无法忍受的;难耐的 { :8495}

vividly ['vɪvɪdlɪ] adv. 生动地;强烈地 {cet6 :8508}

mystical [ˈmɪstɪkl] adj. 神秘的;神秘主义的 { :8509}

disgrace [dɪsˈgreɪs] n. 耻辱;丢脸的人或事;失宠 vt. 使……失宠;给……丢脸;使……蒙受耻辱;贬黜 {cet6 ky toefl :8519}

alluded [əˈlu:did] vi. 暗指,转弯抹角地说到;略为提及,顺便提到 { :8601}

triumphant [traɪˈʌmfənt] adj. 成功的;得意洋洋的;狂欢的 {cet6 :8646}

disapproval [ˌdɪsəˈpru:vl] n. 不赞成;不喜欢 {cet6 toefl :8652}

rhyme [raɪm] n. 韵律;韵脚;韵文;押韵词 vt. 使押韵;用韵诗表达;把…写作诗 vi. 押韵;作押韵诗 {gk gre :8663}

instinctive [ɪnˈstɪŋktɪv] adj. 本能的;直觉的;天生的 {toefl gre :8715}

dread [dred] n. 恐惧;可怕的人(或物) vt. 惧怕;担心 adj. 可怕的 vi. 惧怕;担心 {cet4 cet6 ky toefl ielts :8728}

impersonal [ɪmˈpɜ:sənl] n. 非人称动词;不具人格的事物 adj. 客观的;非个人的;没有人情味的;非人称的 {toefl :8797}

civilised ['sɪvəlaɪzd] adj. 文明的 { :8881}

psychologically [ˌsaɪkə'lɒdʒɪklɪ] adv. 心理上地;心理学地 { :9081}

abraham ['eɪbrəˌhæm] n. 亚伯拉罕(男子名) { :9098}

wisely [waɪzlɪ] adv. 明智地;聪明地;精明地 n. (Wisely)人名;(英)怀斯利 { :9108}

potency [ˈpəʊtnsi] n. 效能;力量;潜力;权势 { :9122}

motherhood [ˈmʌðəhʊd] n. 母性;母亲身份;母亲们(总称) { :9200}

singular [ˈsɪŋgjələ(r)] n. 单数 adj. 单数的;单一的;非凡的;异常的 {cet4 cet6 ky ielts :9212}

germ [dʒɜ:m] n. [植] 胚芽,萌芽;细菌 vi. 萌芽 {cet4 cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :9241}

tyranny [ˈtɪrəni] n. 暴政;专横;严酷;残暴的行为(需用复数) {cet6 gre :9346}

sterile [ˈsteraɪl] adj. 不育的;无菌的;贫瘠的;不毛的;枯燥乏味的 {toefl gre :9354}

bestowed [biˈstəud] vt. 使用;授予;放置;留宿 { :9425}

hesitant [ˈhezɪtənt] adj. 迟疑的;踌躇的;犹豫不定的 { :9455}

unimportant [ˌʌnɪmˈpɔ:tnt] adj. 不重要的;琐碎的 {gk :9487}

incompetent [ɪnˈkɒmpɪtənt] n. 无能力者 adj. 无能力的,不胜任的;不合适的;不适当的;无力的 {toefl gre :9501}

ingenious [ɪnˈdʒi:niəs] adj. 有独创性的;机灵的,精制的;心灵手巧的 {cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :9550}

precarious [prɪˈkeəriəs] adj. 危险的;不确定的 {toefl ielts gre :9563}

agreeable [əˈgri:əbl] adj. 令人愉快的;适合的;和蔼可亲的 {cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :9587}

powerfully ['paʊəfəlɪ] adv. 强大地;强烈地;非常 { :9608}

feeble [ˈfi:bl] adj. 微弱的,无力的;虚弱的;薄弱的 {cet4 cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :9622}

delicacy [ˈdelɪkəsi] n. 美味;佳肴;微妙;精密;精美;敏锐,敏感;世故,圆滑 {cet6 gre :9737}

passionately ['pæʃənətlɪ] adv. 热情地;强烈地;激昂地 { :9790}

vocation [vəʊˈkeɪʃn] n. 职业;天职;天命;神召 {cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :9913}

vulgar [ˈvʌlgə(r)] n. 平民,百姓 adj. 粗俗的;通俗的;本土的 {cet6 ky toefl ielts gre :9913}

scolded [skəuldid] v. 责骂,训斥(scold的过去式);批评 { :10246}

scolding [skəʊldɪŋ] n. 责骂,斥责 v. 责骂;训斥(scold的ing形式) adj. 责骂的 { :10246}

reverence [ˈrevərəns] n. 崇敬;尊严;敬礼 vt. 敬畏;尊敬 {toefl :10327}

wakefield ['weikfi:ld] n. 韦克菲尔德(英格兰北部城市) { :10388}

tenderness ['tendənɪs] n. 亲切;柔软;柔和;敏感;棘手 {toefl :10448}

wring [rɪŋ] vt. 拧;绞;紧握;使痛苦;折磨 vi. 蠕动;扭动;感到痛苦;感到苦恼 n. 拧;绞;挤;扭动 {cet6 toefl :10500}

delineated [dɪˈlɪni:ˌeɪtid] 描绘(delineate的过去式和过去分词) { :10523}

derailed [dɪ'reɪld] v. [铁路] 出轨(derail的过去式) adj. (火车)出轨的 { :10587}

patriots [ˈpeitriəts] n. 爱国者,爱国主义者( patriot的名词复数 ) { :10621}

dwindle [ˈdwɪndl] vi. 减少;变小 vt. 使缩小,使减少 {toefl ielts gre :10733}

dwindling [ˈdwindlɪŋ] 减少 变小 退化 使减少(dwindle的现在分词) { :10733}

conscientious [ˌkɒnʃiˈenʃəs] adj. 认真的;尽责的;本着良心的;小心谨慎的 {ky toefl ielts gre :11085}

baffled ['bæfld] v. 阻碍;使迷惑(baffle的过去式) adj. 带有挡板的 { :11102}

unwittingly [ʌnˈwɪtɪŋli] adv. 不知不觉地;不知情地;不经意地 { :11194}

ferocious [fəˈrəʊʃəs] adj. 残忍的;惊人的 {toefl ielts gre :11205}

timid [ˈtɪmɪd] adj. 胆小的;羞怯的 {cet4 cet6 ky toefl gre :11301}

harmonious [hɑ:ˈməʊniəs] adj. 和谐的,和睦的;协调的;悦耳的 {cet6 toefl :11319}

instilling [ɪns'tɪlɪŋ] vt. 徐徐滴入;逐渐灌输 { :11368}

pervade [pəˈveɪd] vt. 遍及;弥漫 {toefl ielts gre :11414}

cleanliness [ˈklenlinəs] n. 清洁 {cet6 :11509}

purged [pə:dʒd] 净化 { :11512}

unhappiness [ʌn'hæpɪnəs] n. 苦恼;忧愁 { :11535}

conventionally [kənˌvenʃənəlɪ] adv. 照惯例,照常套 {toefl :11565}

watchful [ˈwɒtʃfl] adj. 注意的;警惕的;警醒的 {cet6 :11612}

tyrants [ˈtaɪərənts] n. 专制统治者( tyrant的名词复数 ); 暴君似的人; (古希腊的)僭主; 严酷的事物 { :11629}

Stockholm ['stɒkhәulm] n. 斯德哥尔摩(瑞典首都) { :11810}

attractiveness [ə'træktɪvnəs] n. 吸引力;迷惑力 { :11832}

aptitude [ˈæptɪtju:d] n. 天资;自然倾向;适宜 {toefl ielts gre :11916}

camouflage [ˈkæməflɑ:ʒ] n. 伪装,掩饰 vt. 伪装,掩饰 vi. 伪装起来 {toefl gre :12127}

replenished [rɪ'plenɪʃt] v. 重新装满;添加;充注精力(replenish的过去分词) adj. 装满的;充满的 { :12129}

forgo [fɔ:'ɡəʊ] vi. 放弃;停止;对…断念 vt. 放弃;停止;对…断念 [ 过去式forwent 过去分词forgone 现在分词forgoing ] {gre :12568}

bosom [ˈbʊzəm] n. 胸;胸怀;中间;胸襟;内心;乳房;内部 adj. 知心的;亲密的 vt. 怀抱;把…藏在心中 n. (Bosom)人名;(西)博索姆 {cet4 cet6 ky :12605}

calculus [ˈkælkjələs] n. [病理] 结石;微积分学 {cet6 gre :12738}

helplessness ['helpləsnəs] n. 无能为力;无可奈何状态 { :12746}

immortality [ˌɪmɔ:ˈtæləti] n. 不朽;不朽的声名;不灭 { :12858}

fodder [ˈfɒdə(r)] n. 饲料;素材 vt. 喂 {gre :12879}

pacifist [ˈpæsɪfɪst] n. 和平主义者 adj. 非战主义的 {gre :12891}

mystic [ˈmɪstɪk] adj. 神秘的;神秘主义的 n. 神秘主义者 {gre :13113}

futility [fju:'tɪlətɪ] n. 无用;徒劳;无价值 {ky gre :13526}

diseased [dɪˈzi:zd] adj. 不健全的;患病的;病态的 v. 使生病;传染(disease的过去分词) { :13972}

singularly [ˈsɪŋgjələli] adv. 异常地;非常地;令人无法理解地 { :14060}

unworthy [ʌnˈwɜ:ði] adj. 不值得的;无价值的;不相称的 { :14125}

exhortations [ˌegzɔ:ˈteɪʃənz] n. 敦促( exhortation的名词复数 ); 极力推荐; (正式的)演讲; (宗教仪式中的)劝诫 { :14140}

astray [əˈstreɪ] adj. 迷路的;离开正道的;不对头的 adv. 误入歧途地;迷途地;迷路 n. (Astray)人名;(西)阿斯特赖 {gre :14149}

disillusionment [ˌdɪsɪˈlu:ʒnmənt] n. 幻灭;醒悟 { :14166}

spinster [ˈspɪnstə(r)] n. 老姑娘;未婚女人 { :14367}

parenthood [ˈpeərənthʊd] n. 亲子关系;父母身份 { :14467}

fussy [ˈfʌsi] adj. 爱挑剔的,难取悦的;易烦恼的 n. (Fussy)人名;(法)菲西 {toefl gre :14480}

acquiesce [ˌækwiˈes] vi. 默许;勉强同意 {gre :14893}

acquiesced [ˌækwi:ˈest] v. 默认,默许( acquiesce的过去式和过去分词 ) { :14893}

ascendancy [ə'sendənsɪ] n. 优势;支配地位(等于ascendency,ascendence) {gre :14964}

possessive [pəˈzesɪv] n. 所有格 adj. 占有的;所有的;所有格的;占有欲强的 { :15089}

pernicious [pəˈnɪʃəs] adj. 有害的;恶性的;致命的;险恶的 {gre :15230}

diminution [ˌdɪmɪˈnju:ʃn] n. 减少,降低;缩小 {gre :15347}

preponderance [prɪˈpɒndərəns] n. 优势;多数;占优势 {toefl :15714}

gentleness ['dʒentlnəs] n. 温顺;亲切;高贵;彬彬有礼 { :15939}

paucity [ˈpɔ:səti] n. 缺乏;少数;少量 {toefl gre :16637}

Tolstoy ['tɔlstɔi] n. 托尔斯泰(俄国小说家) { :16891}

repentance [rɪˈpentəns] n. 悔改;后悔 { :17103}

bygone [ˈbaɪgɒn] n. 过去的事 adj. 过去的 { :17359}

Oedipus ['i:dipәs] n. 俄狄浦斯(希腊神话人物) { :17470}

twofold [ˈtu:fəʊld] adj. 双重的;两倍的 adv. 双重地;两倍地 { :17550}

gratify [ˈgrætɪfaɪ] vt. 使满足;使满意,使高兴 {toefl gre :17764}

gratifies [ˈgrætəˌfaɪz] n. 使高兴,使满意( gratify的名词复数 ) v. 使高兴,使满意( gratify的第三人称单数 ) { :17764}

steeple [ˈsti:pl] n. 尖塔;尖顶 vt. 把…建成尖塔 {gre :17934}

sentimentality [ˌsentɪmenˈtæləti] n. 多愁善感 { :17949}

unfashionable [ʌnˈfæʃnəbl] adj. 过时的;不时髦的 { :18509}

abomination [əˌbɒmɪˈneɪʃn] n. 厌恶;憎恨;令人厌恶的事物 { :19107}


难点词汇
unsatisfied [ʌnˈsætɪsfaɪd] adj. 不满意的;未得到满足的 { :19644}

saintly [ˈseɪntli] adj. 圣洁的 {gre :19683}

atrophied ['ætrəfɪd] adj. 萎缩的;衰退的 v. 萎缩(atrophy的过去分词);使衰退 { :19731}

wiles [waɪlz] n. 诡计;花招(wile的复数) v. 引诱(wile的第三人称单数形式) { :19922}

irksome [ˈɜ:ksəm] adj. 令人厌烦的,讨厌的;令人厌恶的 {gre :20102}

unscientific [ˌʌnˌsaɪənˈtɪfɪk] adj. 不科学的,不符合科学原理的;非学术的;无科学知识的 { :20364}

jailer [ˈdʒeɪlə(r)] n. 狱卒,看守监狱的人 { :20518}

unselfish [ʌnˈselfɪʃ] adj. 无私的,慷慨的 {toefl :20739}

insuperable [ɪnˈsu:pərəbl] adj. 不能克服的;无敌的 {gre :20790}

transmuting [trænsˈmju:tɪŋ] v. 使变形,使变质,把…变成…( transmute的现在分词 ) { :20909}

despot [ˈdespɒt] n. 专制君主,暴君;独裁者 n. (Despot)人名;(塞、罗)德斯波特 {gre :21224}

gradation [grəˈdeɪʃn] n. (色彩、颜色、次序、音调等的)渐变;分等级;(各种状态、性质等的)分阶段渐变;元音交替 {gre :21349}

moralists [ˈmɔ:rəlɪsts] n. 道德家,道德主义者,说教者( moralist的名词复数 ) { :21627}

despotic [dɪ'spɒtɪk] adj. 暴虐的,暴君的;专横的 {gre :23171}

demonstrative [dɪˈmɒnstrətɪv] adj. 说明的;证明的;公开表露感情的 n. 指示词 {gre :23209}

deadens [ˈdednz] v. 抑制 (感情),缓和 (疼痛)( deaden的第三人称单数 ); 减弱 (声音) { :23285}

amelioration [əˌmi:lɪə'reɪʃn] n. 改进,改善 { :23841}

desiccated [ˈdesɪkeɪtɪd] adj. 干的(等于desiccate);粉状的 v. 使干燥(desiccate的过去式);变干 { :23936}

lactation [læk'teɪʃn] n. 哺乳;哺乳期;授乳(形容词lactational);分泌乳汁 { :24474}

solicitude [səˈlɪsɪtju:d] n. 焦虑;渴望;担心 {gre :26980}

gaoler ['dʒeɪlə] n. 监狱看守;监狱长 { :27255}

mortification [ˌmɔ:tɪfɪ'keɪʃn] n. 屈辱;禁欲;坏疽 {gre :28228}

procreative ['prəʊkrɪeɪtɪv] adj. 生产的,生殖的;有生殖力的 { :28424}

pitiable [ˈpɪtiəbl] adj. 可怜的 { :28858}

actuated [ˈæktʃu:ˌeɪtid] adj. 开动的;动作的 v. 驱动;激励(actuate的过去分词形式);使运转 { :29241}

reciprocally [rɪ'sɪprəklɪ] adv. 相互地;相反地;互惠地 { :30176}

unalterable [ʌnˈɔ:ltərəbl] adj. 不能改变的;坚定不移的 { :31236}

possessiveness [pə'zesɪvnəs] n. 占有;自制力 { :31434}

disorganised [ ] adj. 组织混乱的,无系统的,杂乱无章的 { :32790}

aright [əˈraɪt] adv. 正确地 { :33340}

wearisome [ˈwɪərisəm] adj. 使疲倦的;使厌倦的;乏味的 {gre :33469}

listlessness ['lɪstləsnəs] n. 无精打采;精神萎靡 { :36163}

chary [ˈtʃeəri] adj. 谨慎的;仔细的;吝啬的;怕羞的 n. (Chary)人名;(法)沙里;(俄)恰雷 {toefl gre :37856}

wellesley ['welzli] n. 韦尔兹利(姓氏) { :38862}

Macduff [ ] 麦克达夫 { :39880}

pugnacity [pʌɡ'næsətɪ] n. 好斗,好战 { :40100}

Priam ['praiәm] n. 普里阿摩斯(特洛伊末代王) { :44070}

prate [preɪt] n. 唠叨;空谈;瞎扯 n. (Prate)人名;(法)普拉特 vt. 瞎扯 vi. 唠叨 {toefl gre :48340}


生僻词
absent-minded [ˌæbsənt'maɪndɪd] adj. 心不在焉的;健忘的;出神的

birth-rate ['bɜ:θr'eɪt] [医] 出生率

book-learning [ ] n. 书本知识

brow-beating ['braʊbiːt] vt. 恫吓,吓唬;欺侮

day-time ['deɪtaɪm] n. 白天

deep-seated ['di:ps'i:tɪd] adj. 深层的;根深蒂固的;深位的

externalised [ ] (externalise 的过去分词) vt.<主英>=externalize

externalising [ ] (externalise 的现在分词) vt.<主英>=externalize

fascinator ['fæsɪneɪtə] n. 魅惑者[物],头巾的一种

fot [ ] abbr. fotographie (Dutch=photography) (荷兰语)摄影; fuel-oil transfer 燃料油输送; free of tax (ation) 免税; fiber optical tube 光纤(维)管

germ-plasm [d'ʒɜ:mpl'æzəm] [医] 种质,胚质

heaven-sent [ˈhevənsent] adj. 天赐的;天赋的;最合时宜的

Hecuba ['hekjubә] n. 赫卡伯(特洛伊王之妻)

hell-fire ['helf'aɪər] n. 地狱之火

hey-day [ ] n. 全盛期;极盛时期;名噪一时

ninety-nine ['nainti'nain] n. 九十九

old-fashioned [ˈəuldˈfæʃənd] adj. 老式的;过时的;守旧的

one-sided [ˌwʌnˈsaidid] adj. 片面的,单方面的;不公正的

one-third [ ] 三分之一

over-stimulated [ ] [网络] 过度刺激

poverty-stricken [ˈpɔvəti:ˌstrɪkən] adj. 为贫穷所困恼的,为贫穷所困扰的;非常贫穷的

psycho-analysis [ ] [网络] 精神分析;心理分析;精神分析学

self-confidence [self 'kɒnfɪdəns] n. 自信

self-sacrificing [ˌselfˈsækrifaisiŋ] adj. 自我牺牲的

small-minded [smɔ:lˈmaindid] adj. 心胸狭窄的;固执己见的;气量小的

three-quarters [θ'ri:kw'ɔ:təz] n. 四分之三 adj. 四分之三的

unconscientious [ ] [网络] 良知

ungratified [ʌn'grætɪfaɪd] adj. 不满足的

well-informed ['welɪnf'ɔ:md] adj. 消息灵通的;见多识广的;熟悉的;博学的

well-to-do [wel tə dʊ] adj. 小康的;富裕的


词组
absolute minimum [ ] un. 绝对极小值;绝对最小值;绝对最小植 [网络] 绝对最低限度;绝对最低;绝对的最低限度

admire for [ ] 因…而称赞…

affection for [ ] [网络] 喜爱;对…的爱;情感

allude to [ ] v. 暗指 [网络] 提到;暗示;提及

ancestor worship [ˈænsistə ˈwə:ʃip] [网络] 祖先崇拜;祭祖;敬奉祖先

apt to [æpt tu:] adj. 易于;善于 [网络] 有……的倾向;常会;容易

aptitude for [ ] …的才能

be doing [ ] [网络] 正在做;现在进行时;现在进行时态

bulk of [ ] [网络] 大部分

cannon fodder [ˈkænən ˈfɔdə] n. 炮灰 [网络] 大炮之街;待磨的谷物;勇士们

deaf to [ ] [网络] 不听;不愿听;对……听而不闻

definite form [ ] [网络] 定界形式;定号形式;明确之造型

doing by [ ] 对待

doing good [ ] [网络] 做好事;行善;为善

doing to [ ] na. 处置 [网络] 医療协助

embark upon [ ] un. 登 [网络] 开始;开始,从事,着手;开始工作

endeavour to [inˈdevə tu:] [网络] 争取;努力;例句

every penny [ ] 所有的钱

feel oneself [fi:l wʌnˈself] [网络] 觉得身体正常;觉得正常;觉得身心舒畅的

have an aptitude for [ ] na. 有…的才能 [网络] 有...的才能;擅长于;有…自然倾向

in disgrace [ ] na. 失宠;丢脸 [网络] 失体面;受处分;很不讨人喜欢

in friendship [ ] [网络] 在友谊中

in so doing [ ] prep.这样做时,这样一来

in spite [ ] na. 为泄愤 [网络] 工人们还是很早就出发了;恶意地;尽管

in spite of [in spait ɔv] na. spite of 不管;〔古语〕无视 [网络] 尽管;不顾;虽然 {toefl :0}

incline to [ ] 向…方向弯, 倾斜; (使)具有…倾向

inherit from [ ] [网络] 从…继承;从……继承而来;来自遗传

minimum requirement [ ] [网络] 最低要求;最低的要求;最低标准

minimum requirements [ ] [网络] 最低要求;基本要求;最低任职要求

more reliable [ ] reliable(可靠的)的比较级形式

natural affection [ ] [网络] 亲情;自然亲情;血缘感情

nursery rhyme [ˈnə:səri raim] n. 童谣;儿歌 [网络] 歌谣;摇篮曲;儿歌选

of doing [ ] [网络] 做某事的方法;思考做某事;帮某人忙做

of oneself [ ] na. 独自 [网络] 自发地;自行;自动地

Old Testament [ ] na. (基督教《圣经》的)《旧约全书》 [网络] 旧约圣经;基督教里的旧约圣经;圣经旧约

parental power [ ] [网络] 亲权;父母的权力

prate about [ ] [网络] 空喊;空谈;信口开河地谈论

prey to [ ] 深受…...之害 被…...捕获

professional competence [ ] na. 专业知识;专才 [网络] 专业胜任能力;专业能力;专业技能

regardless of [riˈɡɑ:dlis ɔv] prep. 不管;不顾;不理会 [网络] 不论;无论;不注意

retreat from [ ] v. 放弃;撤退 [网络] 从退出;从……退却;避开

revert to [ ] v. 恢复 [网络] 回复;恢复为;归还

spite of [ ] conj.不管,无视

stamp upon [ ] = stamp on

take the plunge [teik ðə plʌndʒ] na. 冒险尝试;蛮干;毅然从事 [网络] 采取断然行动;孤注一掷;决定冒险一试

taken the plunge [ ] 冒险尝试;采取决定性步骤

takes the plunge [ ] 冒险尝试;采取决定性步骤

the bulk [ðə bʌlk] [网络] 大多数

the bulk of [ðə bʌlk ɔv] adj. 大多数;大部分 [网络] 的主要部分;大半;大部分的

the divine [ ] [网络] 神圣者;神性;神圣的

the minimum [ ] [网络] 最少的时间;温和敏感肌肤专用系列

the Old Testament [ ] na. 旧约全书 [网络] 旧约圣经;旧约雅歌;圣经旧约

the patriot [ ] [网络] 爱国者;火线战将;孤军雄心

the possessive [ ] [网络] 名词的所有格

the rod [ ] [网络] 生活美学演绎插画时尚创意;权杖

the sacred [ ] [网络] 神圣;神圣的;神圣者

to doing [ ] [网络] 喜欢做……胜过做;介词;等等,请注意平时仔细积累

to embark [ ] 乘船

to inherit [ ] [网络] 继承;去继承;承继

to reproduce [ ] [网络] 复制;文化差异再现;再生产

to satisfy [ ] [网络] 满足;使满足;使相信

unaware of [ˌʌnəˈweə ɔv] adj. 不觉察 [网络] 没有意识到;不知道;没觉察到

virtue of [ ] [网络] 有…优点

Wellesley College [ ] n. 威尔斯利学院


惯用语
of course



单词释义末尾数字为词频顺序
zk/中考 gk/中考 ky/考研 cet4/四级 cet6/六级 ielts/雅思 toefl/托福 gre/GRE
* 词汇量测试建议用 testyourvocab.com